Unlike money, personal belongings usually cannot be divided equally after their owner passes away. For this reason, distributing possessions like furniture, jewelry, dishes, silverware, artwork, photographs or clothing is often the most difficult challenge in settling an estate.
It can help if the deceased person had stated in her will or in a separate memorandum who should receive what. In some states, reference within a will to such a separate document over what is technically called “tangible personal property” makes the list binding.
Often items of little monetary value have great emotional significance. This can make distribution difficult when more than one person feels attached to a particular item. The process can also become the venue for playing out old family insecurities and grievances. Everyone may revert to the relationships they had as teenagers.
That said, most families are able to work out the distribution of personal belongings that have not been directed by the decedent in a fair way. Here are a few methods:
Draw lots and take turns picking items. To make this method even fairer, change the order with each round of choosing. The person who went second in the first round goes first in the second round. For instance, if there are four children, the order of choosing personal items would flow as follows: 1-2-3-4, 2-3-4-1, 3-4-1-2, etc.
Use colored stickers for each person to indicate what he wants. The process may be expedited by each person putting a sticker on the items he wants. Where there’s only one sticker on an item, it will go to that person. Where there’s more than one sticker, then the family may revert to taking turns on the contested items.
Get appraisals. Deciding on who gets what can become more difficult if some items have significantly more value than others. If families were to use the taking turns method of distribution, the person who gets the first pick may walk off with the only Rembrandt. It may be necessary for a few rounds for everyone to choose items of similar value, some people getting a single item while others choose several that together are worth as much as the most expensive possession. In other cases, the individual or individuals getting the most valuable items may have to pay the other family members for the value or the family members may decide that the only fair way to go is to sell the most valuable possessions and share the proceeds equally.
Make copies. While many personal belongings are unique, in the case of photographs and videos copies can be almost as good as the original. Many family members will be as happy with a copy.
Work with a senior move manager, who can serve as a neutral third party who can be trusted by family members and defuse the strong feelings among siblings.
Bring in a mediator. Where there are conflicts among family members over particular items, often estate attorneys act as mediators. But attorneys are often expensive and goal oriented. They want to get the property distributed and complete the task of closing out the estate. A trained mediator can often do a better job of helping the family members get at the root of the interests with the process, healing past wounds and ruptures rather than exacerbating them.
In many cases, families use a combination of these methods to come up with a fair system of distribution. Sometimes, however, people’s schedules get in the way of everyone meeting in one place to make distributions or the process gets dragged out for other reasons.
The University of Minnesota Extension School has developed useful materials to help families resolve issues around distribution of personal possessions called Who Will Get Grandma’s Yellow Pie Plate? which is available both online and in a workbook format. It is a great place to start both for parents planning the distribution of their estate and for executors figuring out what to do after the fact.

Leave a Comment